Monday, December 10, 2012

Report: Atheists face discrimination, persecution

By NBC News staff and wire reports

GENEVA -- Atheists and other religious skeptics suffer persecution or discrimination in many parts of the world and in at least seven countries can be executed if their beliefs become known, according to a report issued Monday.

The study, from the International Humanist and Ethical Union (IHEU), showed that "unbelievers" in Islamic countries face the most severe -- sometimes brutal -- treatment at the hands of the state and adherents of the official religion.

But it also points to policies in some European countries and the United States that favor the religious and their organizations and treat atheists and humanists as outsiders.

The report, "Freedom of Thought 2012," said "there are laws that deny atheists' right to exist, curtail their freedom of belief and expression, revoke their right to citizenship, restrict their right to marry."

Other laws "obstruct their access to public education, prohibit them from holding public office, prevent them from working for the state, criminalize their criticism of religion, and execute them for leaving the religion of their parents."

In the United States, for example, where freedom of religion and speech is protected, a social and political climate prevails "in which atheists and the non-religious are made to feel like lesser Americans, or non-Americans,"?the report said.

In at least seven U.S. states, constitutional provisions are in place that bar atheists from public office and one state, Arkansas, has a law that bars atheists from testifying as witnesses at trials, the report said.

Atheist billboard hits snag in Hasidic neighborhood

"It is often not the case that when people hear of freedom of religion they interpret that in terms of the non-religious too," Bob Churchill, a spokesperson for IHEU, told NBC News. "This report shows clearly how people who mildly criticize religion may go on to suffer months or years in jail, even awaiting a death sentence."

The report was welcomed by Heiner Bielefeldt, U.N. special rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief, who said in a brief introduction there was little awareness that atheists were covered by global human rights agreements.

The IHEU -- which links more than 120 humanist, atheist and secular organizations in more than 40 countries -- said it was issuing the report to mark the U.N.'s Human Rights Day on Monday.

According to its survey of some 60 countries, the seven where expression of atheist views or defection from the official religion can bring capital punishment are Afghanistan, Iran, Maldives, Mauritania, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Sudan.

Forced to lie
The 70-page report lists no recent cases of actual execution for "atheism" -- but researchers say the offence is often subsumed into other charges.

Atheists bill big names for 'coming out' party in the capital

In a range of other countries -- such as Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Kuwait and Jordan -- publication of atheist or humanist views on religion are totally banned or strictly limited under laws prohibiting "blasphemy."

In many of these countries, and others like Malaysia, citizens have to register as adherents of a small number officially-recognized religions -- which normally include no more than Christianity and Judaism as well as Islam.

Atheists and humanists are thereby forced to lie to obtain their official documents without which it is impossible to go to university, receive medical treatment, travel abroad or drive.

In Europe, sub-Saharan Africa and Latin and North America, countries which identify themselves as secular give privileges to or favor Christian churches in providing education and other public services, the IHEU said.

In Greece and Russia, the Orthodox Church is fiercely protected from criticism and is given pride of place on state occasions, while in Britain bishops of the Church of England have automatic seats in the upper house of parliament.

NBC News' Rachel Elbaum and Reuters contributed to this report.

More world stories from NBC News:

Follow World News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

?

Source: http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/12/10/15814394-like-lesser-americans-atheists-face-discrimination-persecution-report-says?lite

malin akerman jeff carter chomp national enquirer kate gosselin helicopter crash matt jones

Solutions in your Business: Denver Website development and ...

Not Found -

At PlayPro Media our goal is to ...

"Help talented artists focus on their career, connect to the industry, and build a vibrant fan base."

"Accelerate an artist's path to a larger audience by harnessing our Street Teams and interns to find new talent and help promote their songs locally, where loyalty begins."

"Provide access to students at dozens of the nation's finest schools, allowing you to reach young fans on a daily basis through our EdR footprint."

?

Connect with PlayPro Media

Connect with PlayPro Media and network with music lovers, industry up and commers, bands working to be discovered, and current industry leaders. PlayPro Media is your music hook up.

As a PlayPro Member you will have full access to all PlayPro Media event updates and blogs, special offers, free music downloads.

JOIN THE MUSIC HANG-OUT!

Source: http://www.playpromedia.com/solutions-in-your-business-denver-website-development-and-internet-marketing/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=solutions-in-your-business-denver-website-development-and-internet-marketing

marco rubio farrah abraham Paul Ryan Speech chris cooley chris cooley condoleezza rice Perry Hall High School

GM Launches Chevy Sail In India

GM India launched the Chevrolet Sail U-Va (hatchback) in November, replacing the outdated Aveo range in the process. The subcompact hatch is built on GM?s new global small passenger car platform designed specifically for fast-growing emerging markets, and has a starting price of 444,000 Indian Ruppes (roughly $8,100 using current conversion rates).

Engine Choices

The car is offered in India with a choice of two engines ? a 1.3 liter diesel and a 1.2 liter petrol unit.

The 1.3 liter Smartech common rail diesel engine was developed by the GM Diesel Engine Tech Center in Turin, Italy with support from engineers in Pune and Bangalore. The diesel-burning four-banger makes 78 PS (76 horsepower) @ 4,000 RPM and 205 Nm (151 lb.-ft.) of torque, while achieving 22.1 km/l (50 MPG) @ 1,750 RPM.

Meanwhile, the 1.2 liter Smartech gasoline burner was developed entirely in India and makes 86 PS (84 horsepower) @ 6,000 RPM and 113 Nm (83 lb.-ft.) of torque @ 5,000 RPM.

Both engines are built at GM?s flexible engine plant in Pune, India. Interestingly, the car?s fuel tank is placed in the middle of the car to maximize interior space and provide ample legroom (we wonder why GM didn?t think to do the same in the 2013 Malbu).

Centrally-placed gas tank

Exterior Colors

The Sail is offered in seven colors, including:

  • Super Red
  • Switchblade Silver
  • Summit White
  • Caviar Black
  • Linen Beige
  • Sandrift Grey
  • Misty Lake

Sometimes we wonder why GM doesn?t rename its Silver Ice Metallic color (available in North America) to Switchblade Silver? because that just sounds so cool.

Infotainment

The Sail offers the ?Fun-Wide? audio system that features Bluetooth functionality and supports up to five phone pairings. Audio streaming is part of the package, as are 4 speakers (2 in the front and 2 in the rear).

Testing & Validation

GM says that its engineers at the Technical Center in Bangalore, India ?spent nearly two years adapting the platform for India to ensure that it would meet the requirements of the Indian market and Indian car buyers.? We can?t imagine it took that long to tweak an already-existing vehicle (the Sail has been sold in China for the last few years); as such, we have a hunch that the time was spent testing and sourcing local parts, as Indian law requires a high percentage of local content to meet local requirements.

To that end, The General says that 1,567 parts and components were subjected to the same stringent global testing procedures that apply to GM?s other offerings.

The Sail hatch is expected to be joined by its sedan counterpart as well as the Sail MPV ? which is really a rebadged GM-Wuling Hong Guang microvan. We?ll be here to report on when that takes place.

Google+

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/gmauthority/~3/pBTYBfisMIM/

super bowl start time target jason wu gi joe jason wu for target collection jason wu jason wu the patriot

Instagram officially kills photo integration within Twitter, leaves no trace behind

http://www.engadget.com/2012/12/09/instagram-kills-twitter-photo-integration/

If you've taken to Twitter today, it's likely that you noticed all your Instagram photos that were stored as gallery Cards are gone. Unfortunately, this isn't a temporary glitch: as of today, the photo-sharing service has officially killed all photo integration on Twitter. So, although links to your photos will function like normal, there is no way to preview them within Twitter anymore. If you'll recall, it was merely a few days ago that Instagram pulled Card support from Twitter, which made any filtered snapshots display in wonky fashions within the micro-blogging network. While today's move by Instagram isn't totally shocking -- it would rather you view pictures on its new browser-accesible profiles, after all -- it's a shame that the contents of many Twitter galleries have vanished in a flash.

Comments

Via: Gizmodo, Instagram

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2012/12/09/instagram-kills-twitter-photo-integration/

pietrus cheney tori spelling marion barber marion barber syracuse ohio state

The Comics Reporter Video Parade

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CrBriefings/~3/oV8_aE-W9ks/

nfl playoff picture rose bowl 2012 sat cheating scandal hangover cure lebron james engaged auld lang syne end of the world 2012

UN conference adopts extension of Kyoto accord

Local and international activists demonstrate inside a conferences center to demand urgent action to address climate change at the U.N. climate talks in Doha, Qatar, ,Saturday, Dec.8, 2012. After all-night wrangling, the latest draft agreements Saturday lacked the strong commitments on climate action and financing by rich countries that poor countries had hoped for. But they did include a text on "loss and damage," a relatively new concept which relates to damages from climate-related disasters. (AP Photo/Osama Faisal)

Local and international activists demonstrate inside a conferences center to demand urgent action to address climate change at the U.N. climate talks in Doha, Qatar, ,Saturday, Dec.8, 2012. After all-night wrangling, the latest draft agreements Saturday lacked the strong commitments on climate action and financing by rich countries that poor countries had hoped for. But they did include a text on "loss and damage," a relatively new concept which relates to damages from climate-related disasters. (AP Photo/Osama Faisal)

Norwegian Environmental Minister B?rd Vegar, second right, speaks to local and international activists during their protest inside a conference center to demand urgent action to address climate change at the U.N. climate talks in Doha, Qatar, Saturday, Dec. 8, 2012. After all-night wrangling, the latest drafts Saturday lacked the strong commitments on climate action and financing by rich countries that poor countries had hoped for. But they did include a text on "loss and damage," a relatively new concept which relates to damages from climate-related disasters. (AP Photo/Osama Faisal)

Local and international activists march inside a conference center under a giant statue of a spider to demand urgent action to address climate change at the U.N. climate talks in Doha, Qatar, Friday, Dec. 7, 2012. A dispute over money clouded U.N. climate talks Friday, as rich and poor countries sparred over funds meant to help the developing world cover the rising costs of mitigating global warming and adapting to it. (AP Photo/Osama Faisal)

Local and international activists protest inside a conference center to demand urgent action to address climate change at the U.N. climate talks in Doha, Qatar, Saturday, Dec. 8, 2012. After all-night wrangling, the latest draft agreements Saturday lacked the strong commitments on climate action and financing by rich countries that poor countries had hoped for. But they did include a text on "loss and damage," a relatively new concept which relates to damages from climate-related disasters. (AP Photo/Osama Faisal)

Local and international activists protest inside a conference center to demand urgent action to address climate change at the U.N. climate talks in Doha, Qatar, Saturday, Dec. 8, 2012. After all-night wrangling, the latest drafts Saturday lacked the strong commitments on climate action and financing by rich countries that poor countries had hoped for. But they did include a text on "loss and damage," a relatively new concept which relates to damages from climate-related disasters. (AP Photo/Osama Faisal)

DOHA, Qatar (AP) ? Seeking to control global warming, nearly 200 countries agreed Saturday to extend the Kyoto Protocol, a treaty that limits the greenhouse gas output of some rich countries, but will only cover about 15 percent of global emissions.

The extension was adopted by a U.N. climate conference after hard-fought sessions and despite objections from Russia. The package of decisions also included vague promises of financing to help poor countries cope with climate change, and an affirmation of a previous decision to adopt a new global climate pact by 2015.

Though expectations were low for the two-week conference in Doha, many developing countries rejected the deal as insufficient to put the world on track to fight the rising temperatures that are shifting weather patterns, melting glaciers and raising sea levels. Some Pacific island nations see this as a threat to their existence.

"This is not where we wanted to be at the end of the meeting, I assure you," said Nauru Foreign Minister Kieren Keke, who leads an alliance of small island states. "It certainly isn't where we need to be in order to prevent islands from going under and other unimaginable impacts."

The two-decade-old U.N. climate talks have so-far failed in their goal of reducing the carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions that a vast majority of scientists says are warming the planet.

The 1997 Kyoto Protocol, which controls the emissions of rich countries, is considered the main achievement of the negotiations, even though the U.S. rejected it because it didn't impose any binding commitments on China and other emerging economies.

Kyoto was due to expire this year, so failing to agree on an extension would have been a major setback for the talks. Despite objections from Russia, which opposed rules limiting its use of carbon credits, the accord was extended through 2020 to fill the gap until a wider global treaty is expected to take effect.

However, the second phase only covers about 15 percent of global emissions after Canada, Japan, New Zealand and Russia opted out.

The decisions in Doha mean that in future years, the talks can focus on the new treaty, which is supposed to apply to both rich and poor countries. It is expected to be adopted in 2015 and take effect five years later, but the details haven't been worked out yet.

U.S. climate envoy Todd Stern highlighted one of the main challenges going forward when he said the U.S. couldn't accept a provision in the Doha deal that said the talks should be "guided" by principles laid down in the U.N.'s framework convention for climate change.

That could be interpreted as a reference to the firewall between rich and poor countries that has guided the talks so far, but which the U.S. and other developed countries say must be removed going forward.

"We are now on our way to the new regime," European Climate Commissioner Connie Hedegaard said. It definitely wasn't an easy ride, but we managed to cross the bridge."

"Hopefully from here we can increase our speed," she added. "The world needs it more than ever."

The goal of the U.N. talks is to keep temperatures from rising more than 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit (2 Celsius), compared to preindustrial times. Temperatures have already risen about 1.4 degrees Fahrenheit (0.8 Celsius) above that level, according to the latest report by the U.N.'s top climate body.

A recent projection by the World Bank showed temperatures are on track to rise by up to 7.2 Fahrenheit (4 Celsius) by the year 2100.

"For all of the nations wrestling with the new reality of climate change - which includes the United States - this meeting failed to deliver the goods," said Alden Meyer, of the Union of Concerned Scientists.

"At the end of the day, ministers were left with two unpalatable choices: accept an abysmally weak deal, or see the talks collapse in acrimony and despair ? with no clear path forward," Meyer said.

Poor countries came into the talks in Doha demanding a timetable on how rich countries would scale up climate change aid for them to $100 billion annually by 2020 ? a general pledge that was made three years ago.

But rich nations, including the United States, members of the European Union and Japan are still grappling with the effects of a financial crisis and were not interested in detailed talks on aid in Doha.

The agreement on financing made no reference to any mid-term financing targets, just a general pledge to "identify pathways for mobilizing the scaling up of climate finance."

Tim Gore, climate policy adviser at British aid group Oxfam said the Doha deal imperiled the lives and livelihoods of the world's poorest communities, who are the most vulnerable to shifts in climate.

"It's nothing short of betrayal of the responsibilities of developed countries," he said. "We are now in the red zone in fighting climate change."

Small island nations scored a victory by getting the conference to adopt a text on "loss and damage," a relatively new concept which relates to damages from climate-related disasters.

Island nations under threat from rising sea levels have been pushing for some mechanism to help them cope with such natural catastrophes, but the United States has pushed back over concerns it might be held liable for the cleanup bill since it is the world's second-biggest emitter behind China.

___

Karl Ritter can be reached at www.twitter.com/karl_ritter and Michael Casey Casey at www.twitter.com/mcasey1

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/f70471f764144b2fab526d39972d37b3/Article_2012-12-08-Climate%20Talks/id-21ac7123de6142028e3d1d8260e5ea6e

sag awards pro bowl 2012 roster yamaguchi road house occupy oakland occupy oakland morgellons disease

California couples on stand-by as Supreme Court considers gay ...

By Claudia Boyd-Barrett, December 9, 2012

After four years on stand-by, thousands of gay couples hoping to marry legally in California learned Friday they could be in for another six-month wait.

That didn't stop a flurry of excitement among gay rights activists over news the U.S. Supreme Court will rule on the constitutionality of the state's same-sex marriage ban.

The final decision, expected by June, could have far-reaching implications for the future of gay marriage, not only in California, but also throughout the United States.

"It's incredible the progress that has been made," said San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera, a plaintiff in the case. "The Supreme Court has signaled its readiness to consider the civil rights issue of our time."
At the heart of the case is California's Proposition 8, a ballot measure passed by voters in 2008 that restricted marriage to relationships between a man and a woman. That effectively banned gay marriage in the state, which California?s Supreme Court had legalized a few months earlier.

Since then, two federal courts have ruled California's ban unconstitutional. The U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether to uphold that opinion. If it does, experts say it could open the way to dissolving gay marriage bans across the country.

The justices said today they will also consider challenges to the 1996 U.S. Defense of Marriage Act, which blocks married same-sex couples from receiving federal tax breaks and other benefits bestowed on heterosexual spouses.

"Today's news is nothing short of a milestone moment, quite frankly, for equality,? proclaimed Chad Griffin, co-founder of the American Foundation for Equal Rights, the organization sponsoring the case against Proposition 8.

Mr. Griffin pointed to growing support for gay marriage across the country, evidenced in opinion polls and the recent approval of same-sex marriage by voters in Maryland, Maine and Washington State. He also noted President Obama's declared support. Currently, nine states and the District of Columbia recognize same-sex marriage.

Foes of gay marriage in California vowed to continue their opposition. Protect Marriage, the official proponent of Proposition 8, issued a statement on its website saying the organization sees the Supreme Court?s decision as an opportunity to have the opinion of California voters heard.

?More than seven million Californians of all races, creeds, and walks of life voted for Proposition 8 to preserve the traditional definition of marriage,? the statement said. ?They believe that the unique relationship between one man and one woman continues to meaningfully serve as the cornerstone of society.?

The organization?s spokesman cold not be reached for comment.

Meanwhile, some gay marriage advocates in California expressed frustration at the Supreme Court's decision.
If the court had dismissed the Proposition 8 case, the ruling to strike it down would have stood, allowing gay marriage to resume immediately.

"Emotionally, I have to say my heart hit my feet when I read the decision," said Lisa Phillian, a same-sex wedding officiant and owner of Rainbow Weddings in Rosemead, southern California. "I have so many clients that have been waiting to have a legal marriage.?

The approximately 40 gay couples she marries a year are recognized in the state as domestic partners. But they long for the rights and protections a full legal marriage would bring, such as transferable Social Security benefits or a military pension, she said. Some have spouses serving in the U.S. Army and fear what would happen to them if their partner were killed, Ms. Phillian said.

Still, she said the Supreme Court's decision to examine Proposition 8 could ultimately be worthwhile.


Now's a great time to subscribe to The Progressive magazine. You'll get a FREE copy of our 2013 "Hidden History of the United States" calendar when you subscribe for just $14.97 for the whole year. That's 75% off the newsstand price, and the calendar is yours for free. Just click here.

Source: http://www.progressive.org/california-couples-on-stand-by-as-supreme-court-considers-gay-marriage

joran van der sloot honey badger critics choice awards 2012 colbert president huntingtons disease rob the firm